Chefs underpaid, forced to work 70 hours a week with break ‘from time to time’, court told

 In Home News Section, Uncategorized

Two migrant workers “vulnerable and dependent upon the good will of their employer” have claimed they were forced to work around 70 hours a week, often without breaks, for $600 pay.

Pakistani national Midhun Basi and Indian national Syed Haider are suing Vaisakh Mohanan Usha and his company, Namitha Nakul Pty Ltd, over alleged breaches of the Fair Work Act.

The men claim Mr Usha offered them employment at his Adythia Kerala restaurants in Wollongong and Nowra between 2016 and 2018 and sponsor them for a 457 visa.

During the first day of a Federal Court hearing on Monday, their barrister Lisa Doust said the pair were required to work from 10:00am to 10:00pm six days a week and were not remunerated in line with National Employment Standards (NES).

“Mr Basi says there were no arrangements for him to have a break during the working day, that from time to time he would have a chance to have something to eat quickly. But there was nothing set,” Ms Doust said in her opening submission.

Alleged job threats

Mr Basi alleges he was paid $1,711 a fortnight but was asked to pay back $511 to Mr Usha to cover the cost of his visa.

“The demands for the money were backed up by threats that the business would close and he would not have a job,” Ms Doust told the court.

“The consequences, if such a threat was carried out, was significant for Mr Basi because of his visa status.

“He was particularly vulnerable and dependent upon the goodwill of his employer.”

Ms Doust claimed Mr Haider was subject to similar treatment while working at the restaurant in Nowra.

She claimed he worked 12-hour days six days a week, and was only being paid $500 “now and then”.

“In several cases the applicants say Mr Usha demanded money from them,” Ms Doust told the court.

“Mr Usha says they were all [repayments for] loans. The court won’t see any written record of any loan arrangement.”

‘Bona fide’ employment contracts

Mr Usha and the company Namitha Nakul disputed the men’s claims of excessive work hours and threats to their jobs.

In his opening submission, defence solicitor Brendan Gillard told Justice John Halley the men’s employment contracts were entered into in good faith.

“We say that the arrangement between employer and employee, in both cases … were bona fide,” Mr Gillard said.

“It’s certainly true that Mr Basi holds a master’s degree and has travelled at least to the United Kingdom before coming to Australia.

“The court will see that there is evidence that he was at least aware of his rights to insist entitlements.

“We say that the employer was eager to increase their capacity to take on business, and the fact there was not enough work for their parties to work full-time, at that time, should not be taken by the court as an indicator that there was something more sinister at play.

“The applicants raised allegations of threat and coercion … the position taken by the respondent is that these threats were not made.”

Mr Gillard said Mr Usha did not demand Mr Basi pay back part of his salary, but that the money was transferred as repayment for personal loans including to help Mr Basi with his wedding and when Mr Basi’s mother was sick.

The hearing is due to continue until Friday.

(Original ABC Article)

ndh_ico